

Expanding on his 1993 'Foreign Affairs' article, Samuel P. Huntington's 'The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order' (1996) argues that in the post-Cold War era, global conflicts have shifted from ideological or economic struggles to cultural and religious ones. Huntington posits that the world is divided into roughly eight major civilizations—Western, Islamic, Sinic (Chinese), Orthodox, Hindu, Japanese, Latin American, and African—and that the most dangerous 'fault lines' exist where these civilizations meet. He suggests that while the West is currently dominant, its influence is relative and declining as other civilizations, particularly the Sinic and Islamic ones, assert their own cultural values and power (Beyond Intractability; SuperSummary).
Huntington argues that the broadest level of identification people have is their civilization, which is defined by shared language, history, religion, and customs. In a post-ideological world, people define themselves by 'who they are' rather than 'whose side they are on' (GradeSaver).
Conflicts are most likely to occur at the boundaries where different civilizations meet, such as the Balkans or the Middle East. These 'fault line wars' are often protracted, violent, and fueled by religious differences (Beyond Intractability).
A central thesis is that non-Western societies can modernize (acquire technology and economic wealth) without becoming Westernized (adopting Western liberal values). This allows them to challenge Western hegemony using Western-developed tools (SuperSummary).
Huntington highlights a growing resentment among non-Western civilizations toward Western universalism. He argues that the West's attempt to impose its values as 'universal' is often seen as imperialism, leading to 'kin-country' alliances where civilizations rally together against Western pressure (Independent Institute).